CVE-2026-27576: OpenClaw: ACP prompt-size checks missing in local stdio bridge could reduce responsiveness with very large inputs
Vulnerability The ACP bridge accepted very large prompt text blocks and could assemble oversized prompt payloads before forwarding them to chat.send. Because ACP runs over local stdio, this mainly affects local ACP clients (for example IDE integrations) that send unusually large inputs.
Published Feb 20, 2026 · Updated Feb 23, 2026
Affected packages
openclaw
- Ecosystem
- npm
- Affected
- <= 2026.2.17
- Fixed in
- 2026.2.19
- Check
npm ls openclaw
Advisory details
From the GitHub Advisory Database (CC BY 4.0).
Vulnerability
The ACP bridge accepted very large prompt text blocks and could assemble oversized prompt payloads before forwarding them to chat.send.
Because ACP runs over local stdio, this mainly affects local ACP clients (for example IDE integrations) that send unusually large inputs.
Affected Packages / Versions
- Package:
openclaw(npm) - Affected versions:
<= 2026.2.17 - Patched version:
2026.2.18(planned next release)
Impact
- Local ACP sessions may become less responsive when very large prompts are submitted
- Larger-than-expected model usage/cost when oversized text is forwarded
- No privilege escalation and no direct remote attack path in the default ACP model
Affected Components
src/acp/event-mapper.tssrc/acp/translator.ts
Remediation
- Enforce a 2 MiB prompt-text limit before concatenation
- Count inter-block newline separator bytes during pre-concatenation size checks
- Keep final outbound message-size validation before
chat.send - Avoid stale active-run session state when oversized prompts are rejected
- Add regression tests for oversize rejection and active-run cleanup
Fix Commit(s)
732e53151e8fbdfc0501182ddb0e900878bdc1e3ebcf19746f5c500a41817e03abecadea8655654a63e39d7f57ac4ad4a5e38d17e7394ae7c4dd0b9c
Thanks @aether-ai-agent for reporting.
Credited to aether-ai-agent.
References
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-cxpw-2g23-2vgw
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/63e39d7f57ac4ad4a5e38d17e7394ae7c4dd0b9c
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/8ae2d5110f6ceadef73822aa3db194fb60d2ba68
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/ebcf19746f5c500a41817e03abecadea8655654a
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/releases/tag/v2026.2.19
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-27576
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-cxpw-2g23-2vgw
How this page is made: the data panel comes from the GitHub Advisory Database, CISA’s KEV catalog, the NVD and FIRST EPSS, and updates twice a day. No analysis has been written for this entry yet. Methodology
More OpenClaw vulnerabilities
All OpenClaw entriesCVE-2026-35630
OpenClaw: QQBot native approval buttons did not enforce configured approver identity
high8.0Jul 2, 2026CVE-2026-53806
OpenClaw: Combined POSIX shell options could confuse exec revalidation
high8.8Jul 2, 2026CVE-2026-53809
OpenClaw: Embedded runner policy could be confused by provider aliases
medium3.8Jul 2, 2026CVE-2026-53810
OpenClaw's marketplace runtime extension metadata could point at unscanned payloads
high8.8Jul 2, 2026CVE-2026-53811
OpenClaw: Matrix allowFrom could bind to mutable display names
high8.8Jul 2, 2026CVE-2026-53812
OpenClaw's browser act interactions could bypass private-network navigation checks
medium7.7Jul 2, 2026
