CVE-2026-32028: OpenClaw: Discord DM reaction ingress missed dmPolicy/allowFrom checks in restricted setups
Summary In OpenClaw = 2026.2.25 Fix Commit(s) - aedf62ac7e669a89c7b299201bf6537dc6b12e0e Release Process Note patchedversions is pre-set to the release (2026.2.25) so after npm release the advisory is published. Thanks @tdjackey for reporting.
Published Mar 3, 2026 · Updated Mar 20, 2026
Affected packages
openclaw
- Ecosystem
- npm
- Affected
- <= 2026.2.24
- Fixed in
- 2026.2.25
- Check
npm ls openclaw
Advisory details
From the GitHub Advisory Database (CC BY 4.0).
Summary
In OpenClaw <= 2026.2.24, Discord direct-message reaction notifications did not consistently apply the same DM authorization checks (dmPolicy / allowFrom) that are enforced for normal DM message ingress.
In restrictive DM setups, a non-allowlisted Discord user who can react to a bot-authored DM message could still enqueue a reaction-derived system event in the session.
This is a reaction-only ingress inconsistency. By itself it does not directly execute commands; practical impact depends on downstream automation/tool policy.
Details
The DM message path already enforces dmPolicy/allowFrom authorization, but the DM reaction-notification path previously allowed event enqueue under reaction mode checks without that same authorization gate.
Fix in main aligns reaction ingress with normal message preflight for Discord DM/group-DM/guild policy boundaries and applies equivalent DM reaction authorization hardening for Slack to keep channel behavior consistent.
Affected Packages / Versions
npmpackage:openclaw- Affected:
<= 2026.2.24 - Patched:
>= 2026.2.25
Fix Commit(s)
aedf62ac7e669a89c7b299201bf6537dc6b12e0e
Release Process Note
patched_versions is pre-set to the release (2026.2.25) so after npm release the advisory is published.
Thanks @tdjackey for reporting.
Credited to tdjackey.
References
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-354r-7mfh-7rh2
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/aedf62ac7e669a89c7b299201bf6537dc6b12e0e
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-32028
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-missing-authorization-check-in-discord-dm-reaction-ingress
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-354r-7mfh-7rh2
How this page is made: the data panel comes from the GitHub Advisory Database, CISA’s KEV catalog, the NVD and FIRST EPSS, and updates twice a day. No analysis has been written for this entry yet. Methodology
More OpenClaw vulnerabilities
All OpenClaw entriesCVE-2026-35630
OpenClaw: QQBot native approval buttons did not enforce configured approver identity
high8.0Jul 2, 2026CVE-2026-53806
OpenClaw: Combined POSIX shell options could confuse exec revalidation
high8.8Jul 2, 2026CVE-2026-53809
OpenClaw: Embedded runner policy could be confused by provider aliases
medium3.8Jul 2, 2026CVE-2026-53810
OpenClaw's marketplace runtime extension metadata could point at unscanned payloads
high8.8Jul 2, 2026CVE-2026-53811
OpenClaw: Matrix allowFrom could bind to mutable display names
high8.8Jul 2, 2026CVE-2026-53812
OpenClaw's browser act interactions could bypass private-network navigation checks
medium7.7Jul 2, 2026
