CVE-2026-43580: OpenClaw: Browser press/type interaction routes missed complete navigation guard coverage
Summary Browser press/type interaction routes missed complete navigation guard coverage. Affected Packages / Versions - Package: openclaw - Ecosystem: npm - Affected versions: = 2026.4.10 Impact Some browser press/type style interactions could trigger navigation without complete post-action SSRF policy enforcement.
Published Apr 17, 2026 · Updated May 12, 2026
Affected packages
openclaw
- Ecosystem
- npm
- Affected
- < 2026.4.10
- Fixed in
- 2026.4.10
- Check
npm ls openclaw
Advisory details
From the GitHub Advisory Database (CC BY 4.0).
Summary
Browser press/type interaction routes missed complete navigation guard coverage.
Affected Packages / Versions
- Package:
openclaw - Ecosystem: npm
- Affected versions:
< 2026.4.10 - Patched versions:
>= 2026.4.10
Impact
Some browser press/type style interactions could trigger navigation without complete post-action SSRF policy enforcement.
Technical Details
The fix applies a three-phase interaction navigation guard to navigation-capable interactions, including pressKey and type submit flows.
Fix
The issue was fixed in #62023 and #63226 and #63889. The first stable tag containing the fix is v2026.4.10, and [email protected] includes the fix.
Fix Commit(s)
049acf23cb03e1b92f5c71cd99c6ec5f35cc56fe5f5b3d733bdd791cb457f838514179e1288b10b3e0b8ddc1a55185aff1cf9e0e095014d2e4f1d894- PR: #62023, #63226, #63889
Release Process Note
Users should upgrade to openclaw 2026.4.10 or newer. The latest npm release, 2026.4.14, already includes the fix.
Credits
Thanks to @zsxsoft, with sponsorship from @KeenSecurityLab and @qclawer for reporting this issue.
Credited to zsxsoft, KeenSecurityLab, qclawer.
References
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-536q-mj95-h29h
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/pull/62023
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/pull/63226
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/pull/63889
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/049acf23cb03e1b92f5c71cd99c6ec5f35cc56fe
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/5f5b3d733bdd791cb457f838514179e1288b10b3
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/e0b8ddc1a55185aff1cf9e0e095014d2e4f1d894
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43580
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-incomplete-navigation-guard-coverage-in-browser-interactions
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-536q-mj95-h29h
How this page is made: the data panel comes from the GitHub Advisory Database, CISA’s KEV catalog, the NVD and FIRST EPSS, and updates twice a day. No analysis has been written for this entry yet. Methodology
More OpenClaw vulnerabilities
All OpenClaw entriesCVE-2026-35630
OpenClaw: QQBot native approval buttons did not enforce configured approver identity
high8.0Jul 2, 2026CVE-2026-53806
OpenClaw: Combined POSIX shell options could confuse exec revalidation
high8.8Jul 2, 2026CVE-2026-53809
OpenClaw: Embedded runner policy could be confused by provider aliases
medium3.8Jul 2, 2026CVE-2026-53810
OpenClaw's marketplace runtime extension metadata could point at unscanned payloads
high8.8Jul 2, 2026CVE-2026-53811
OpenClaw: Matrix allowFrom could bind to mutable display names
high8.8Jul 2, 2026CVE-2026-53812
OpenClaw's browser act interactions could bypass private-network navigation checks
medium7.7Jul 2, 2026
