CVE-2026-87013: Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can start a non-terminating request via a folder parent cycle
Summary Any authenticated user can move one of their own folders under itself, leaving a loop in their folder tree. The re-parent endpoint performed no check that the new parent was not the folder itself or one of its own subfolders, and the folder tree walks did not track which folders they had already visited. A single request against a folder in a loop therefore never finishes.
Published Sep 10, 2026
Affected packages
open-webui
- Ecosystem
- PyPI
- Affected
- >= 0.10.0, <= 0.11.0
- Fixed in
- 0.11.1
- Check
pip show open-webui
Advisory details
From the GitHub Advisory Database (CC BY 4.0).
Summary
Any authenticated user can move one of their own folders under itself, leaving a loop in their folder tree. The re-parent endpoint performed no check that the new parent was not the folder itself or one of its own subfolders, and the folder tree walks did not track which folders they had already visited. A single request against a folder in a loop therefore never finishes.
Preconditions
Folders must be enabled (ENABLE_FOLDERS, default true) and the acting user's role must hold the folders feature permission (USER_PERMISSIONS_FEATURES_FOLDERS, default true). Both are on in a default install. Any authenticated account is sufficient: no administrator, no second user, no shared folder and no victim interaction. Deployments that disable folders, or withhold the folders feature permission from non-admin roles, are not affected.
Impact
A single request that never returns. It keeps running after the client disconnects, holds a CPU core and grows its in-memory folder list at roughly 0.6 GB per hour until the process is restarted. The folder stays in the looping state in the database, so any later request touching that folder starts the loop again.
The instance stays responsive while this happens. Each step of the walk waits on a database query, so other users continue to be served normally; measured on a default install, two concurrent instances of this request left unrelated users unaffected, and roughly 900 concurrent requests were needed before anyone else saw a slowdown. Nothing is denied to any other party at the time of the attack, and an unattended instance degrades over hours rather than immediately. No user data is exposed and no data belonging to another user is modified.
Fix
Fixed in 0.11.1 by https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/pull/28748. Moving a folder into itself or into one of its own subfolders is now rejected with a 400, every folder tree walk skips ids it has already visited, and a folder whose parent chain loops is returned to the root the next time the folder list is requested. An instance that already holds folders in this state recovers on upgrade with no operator action.
Root cause
Affected components: the folder re-parent handler POST /api/v1/folders/{id}/update/parent, the subtree walk in the folder model that expands a folder into its descendants, and the two endpoints that call it, DELETE /api/v1/folders/{id} and POST /api/v1/folders/{id}/read. Affected setup: the subtree walk was introduced in 0.10.0, so no earlier release carries the code.
The folder hierarchy is stored as a plain parent reference per folder, with the acyclic property assumed rather than enforced. The write path never validated that assumption, and the read paths were written as if it always held, so nothing on either side would notice or stop a loop.
Proof of concept
Reproduced against a default 0.11.0 install. As an ordinary authenticated user:
- Create a folder and note its id.
POST /api/v1/folders/{id}/update/parentwithparent_idset to that same id. The request is accepted.DELETE /api/v1/folders/{id}(orPOST /api/v1/folders/{id}/read). The request never returns, and the worker continues running after the client disconnects.
No data was seeded directly into the database. Every step ran through the public API.
Credits
@luida-ikura, who reported the folder parent cycle and the non-terminating subtree walk it reaches.
Credited to luida-ikura, Classic298.
References
- https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/security/advisories/GHSA-8r35-5x5r-hv74
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-87013
- https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/pull/28748
- https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/commit/23b3a69bc26839bfa74edd1be6bfa2568ae902f4
- https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/releases/tag/v0.11.1
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-8r35-5x5r-hv74
How this page is made: the data panel comes from the GitHub Advisory Database, CISA’s KEV catalog, the NVD and FIRST EPSS, and updates twice a day. No analysis has been written for this entry yet. Methodology
More Open WebUI vulnerabilities
All Open WebUI entriesCVE-2026-87011
Open WebUI: Unauthenticated requests can stall the server via uncached OIDC fetches in back-channel logout
high7.5Sep 10, 2026CVE-2026-87012
Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can suppress calendar alerts instance-wide via a non-numeric alert value
medium4.3Sep 10, 2026CVE-2026-87014
Open WebUI: Admin demoted through SSO role sync keeps read and write access to all users' notes
medium6.5Sep 10, 2026CVE-2026-87015
Open WebUI: A user's session cookies are sent to tool servers configured for bearer authentication
medium6.8Sep 10, 2026CVE-2026-87016
Open WebUI: Sign-in as another user via wildcard characters in the OAuth subject claim on SQLite
high8.1Sep 10, 2026CVE-2026-87017
Open WebUI: Inaccessible knowledge bases are exposed through the built-in knowledge tool on most vector backends
medium4.3Sep 10, 2026
