GHSA-2hm8-rqrm-xfjq: OpenClaw's owner-only gateway tool access checks were incomplete in specific authenticated DM flows
Summary In authenticated non-owner DM sessions, a narrow tool-invocation path could reach broader-than-intended owner-only gateway actions. Impact This requires an authenticated non-owner sender in a DM session and a specific tool invocation path. No unauthenticated access is involved, and this does not provide direct code execution by itself.
Published Mar 3, 2026
Affected packages
openclaw
- Ecosystem
- npm
- Affected
- < 2026.2.19
- Fixed in
- 2026.2.19
- Check
npm ls openclaw
Advisory details
From the GitHub Advisory Database (CC BY 4.0).
Summary
In authenticated non-owner DM sessions, a narrow tool-invocation path could reach broader-than-intended owner-only gateway actions.
Impact
This requires an authenticated non-owner sender in a DM session and a specific tool invocation path. No unauthenticated access is involved, and this does not provide direct code execution by itself.
Root Cause
- Some gateway call paths were still using broader default scopes instead of method-level least-privilege scopes.
- Owner-only enforcement depended on tool-name checks and was not consistently metadata-driven across all call paths.
Affected Packages / Versions
- Package:
openclaw(npm) - Affected:
<= 2026.2.17(latest published npm version as of February 19, 2026) - Patched:
2026.2.19
Remediation
- Refactored gateway method scope mapping to a data-driven table and added guard tests to ensure all exposed core gateway methods stay classified.
- Centralized owner-only enforcement in tool policy wrappers and tool metadata.
- Marked owner-only tools explicitly (
cron,gateway,whatsapp_login) and removed duplicated per-tool owner checks. - Refactored gateway call path internals into smaller helpers while preserving behavior and coverage.
Fix Commit(s)
a40c10d3e24568b1e2947c104484be74bf66b8d22777d8ad91ef1e8a7c6f5b4b18f8507be7d029143d7ad1cfca4daaa84cd553e843e0e08fa6201349
OpenClaw thanks @Adam55A-code for reporting.
Credited to Adam55A-code.
References
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-2hm8-rqrm-xfjq
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/2777d8ad91ef1e8a7c6f5b4b18f8507be7d02914
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/3d7ad1cfca4daaa84cd553e843e0e08fa6201349
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/a40c10d3e24568b1e2947c104484be74bf66b8d2
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-2hm8-rqrm-xfjq
How this page is made: the data panel comes from the GitHub Advisory Database, CISA’s KEV catalog, the NVD and FIRST EPSS, and updates twice a day. No analysis has been written for this entry yet. Methodology
More OpenClaw vulnerabilities
All OpenClaw entriesCVE-2026-35630
OpenClaw: QQBot native approval buttons did not enforce configured approver identity
high8.0Jul 2, 2026CVE-2026-53806
OpenClaw: Combined POSIX shell options could confuse exec revalidation
high8.8Jul 2, 2026CVE-2026-53809
OpenClaw: Embedded runner policy could be confused by provider aliases
medium3.8Jul 2, 2026CVE-2026-53810
OpenClaw's marketplace runtime extension metadata could point at unscanned payloads
high8.8Jul 2, 2026CVE-2026-53811
OpenClaw: Matrix allowFrom could bind to mutable display names
high8.8Jul 2, 2026CVE-2026-53812
OpenClaw's browser act interactions could bypass private-network navigation checks
medium7.7Jul 2, 2026
