GHSA-2x35-3fw4-9jr4: n8n: Send Email Node Arbitrary File Read and SSRF via Nodemailer Content-Object Type Confusion
Impact The n8n Send Email node did not enforce that its message fields were strings, so a crafted untrusted non-string value from a workflow expression could be treated by the underlying mail library as a file path or URL. This could allow disclosure of local files on the n8n host.
Published Jul 22, 2026
Affected packages
n8n
- Ecosystem
- npm
- Affected
- < 1.123.67
- Fixed in
- 1.123.67
- Check
npm ls n8n
n8n
- Ecosystem
- npm
- Affected
- >= 2.32.0, < 2.32.1
- Fixed in
- 2.32.1
- Check
npm ls n8n
n8n
- Ecosystem
- npm
- Affected
- >= 2.0.0-rc.0, < 2.31.5
- Fixed in
- 2.31.5
- Check
npm ls n8n
Advisory details
From the GitHub Advisory Database (CC BY 4.0).
Impact
The n8n Send Email node did not enforce that its message fields were strings, so a crafted untrusted non-string value from a workflow expression could be treated by the underlying mail library as a file path or URL. This could allow disclosure of local files on the n8n host.
Exploitation requires a pre-existing active workflow with an unauthenticated webhook, valid SMTP credentials configured on the Send Email node, and untrusted input mapped directly into the text or HTML body field. This is not a default n8n configuration.
Patches
The issue has been fixed in n8n versions 1.123.67, 2.31.5, and 2.32.1. Users should upgrade to one of these versions or later to remediate the vulnerability.
Workarounds
If upgrading is not immediately possible, administrators should consider the following temporary mitigations:
- Audit active workflows for Send Email nodes that map untrusted webhook or external data directly into the text or HTML body fields, and remove or restrict those workflows.
- Restrict public webhook access at the network or reverse-proxy level to prevent unauthenticated callers from reaching sensitive workflows.
- Restrict workflow creation and editing permissions to fully trusted users only.
These workarounds do not fully remediate the risk and should only be used as short-term mitigation measures.
Credited to simonkoeck.
References
- https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n/security/advisories/GHSA-2x35-3fw4-9jr4
- https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n/commit/f69dfc6dd2178a14ea1624d2e1d403c2e755042f
- https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n/releases/tag/[email protected]
- https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n/releases/tag/[email protected]
- https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n/releases/tag/[email protected]
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-2x35-3fw4-9jr4
How this page is made: the data panel comes from the GitHub Advisory Database, CISA’s KEV catalog, the NVD and FIRST EPSS, and updates twice a day. No analysis has been written for this entry yet. Methodology
More n8n vulnerabilities
All n8n entriesCVE-2026-86073
n8n: Per-Resource OAuth Consent Bypass via Unbound Refresh Token Resource Substitution
medium5.9Sep 10, 2026CVE-2026-86074
n8n: Instance AI Credential Setup Accepts Unvalidated Probe URL from Fetched Content
medium5.9Sep 10, 2026CVE-2026-86075
n8n: Unauthenticated Persistent Storage Exhaustion via OAuth Dynamic Client Registration Endpoint
high8.7Sep 10, 2026CVE-2026-86076
n8n: Expression Sandbox Escape via Class-Field Sanitizer Rebinding Can Lead to Code Execution
high8.7Sep 10, 2026CVE-2026-86077
n8n: Anonymous Approval-Gate Bypass via Reused resumeToken over the Chat WebSocket
medium6.3Sep 10, 2026CVE-2026-86078
n8n: Prototype Pollution via Workflow Structure Summary Can Lead to Denial of Service
medium6.0Sep 10, 2026
