GHSA-cj9h-qx8g-pq2g: n8n: Shared-Workflow Editor Can Exfiltrate Credentials via Inline Sub-Workflow JSON
Impact n8n's credential-access checks validated only a node's top-level credentials, not credentials referenced inside an Execute Sub-workflow node's inline workflow JSON. A member with editor access to a shared workflow could reference a credential they were not permitted to use inside that inline JSON;
Published Jul 22, 2026
Affected packages
n8n
- Ecosystem
- npm
- Affected
- < 1.123.67
- Fixed in
- 1.123.67
- Check
npm ls n8n
n8n
- Ecosystem
- npm
- Affected
- >= 2.32.0, < 2.32.1
- Fixed in
- 2.32.1
- Check
npm ls n8n
n8n
- Ecosystem
- npm
- Affected
- >= 2.0.0-rc.0, < 2.31.5
- Fixed in
- 2.31.5
- Check
npm ls n8n
Advisory details
From the GitHub Advisory Database (CC BY 4.0).
Impact
n8n's credential-access checks validated only a node's top-level credentials, not credentials referenced inside an Execute Sub-workflow node's inline workflow JSON. A member with editor access to a shared workflow could reference a credential they were not permitted to use inside that inline JSON; it passed both save-time and runtime validation and resolved in the parent workflow's project context, letting the member use or exfiltrate a credential they could not otherwise access.
Exploitation requires workflow sharing to be enabled and the attacker to have been explicitly granted Editor access to a shared workflow. The attacker must also know the target credential's ID.
Patches
The issue has been fixed in n8n versions 1.123.67, 2.31.5, and 2.32.1. Users should upgrade to one of these versions or later to remediate the vulnerability.
Workarounds
If upgrading is not immediately possible, administrators should consider the following temporary mitigations:
- Restrict workflow sharing to fully trusted users only, and avoid granting Editor access to untrusted members on workflows that use sensitive credentials.
- Audit shared workflows for Execute Sub-workflow nodes with Source = "Parameter" and review their inline workflow definitions for unexpected credential references.
- Restrict network egress from the n8n instance to prevent connections to attacker-controlled endpoints.
These workarounds do not fully remediate the risk and should only be used as short-term mitigation measures.
Credited to nlgbao1340.
References
- https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n/security/advisories/GHSA-cj9h-qx8g-pq2g
- https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n/commit/f69dfc6dd2178a14ea1624d2e1d403c2e755042f
- https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n/releases/tag/[email protected]
- https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n/releases/tag/[email protected]
- https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n/releases/tag/[email protected]
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-cj9h-qx8g-pq2g
How this page is made: the data panel comes from the GitHub Advisory Database, CISA’s KEV catalog, the NVD and FIRST EPSS, and updates twice a day. No analysis has been written for this entry yet. Methodology
More n8n vulnerabilities
All n8n entriesCVE-2026-86073
n8n: Per-Resource OAuth Consent Bypass via Unbound Refresh Token Resource Substitution
medium5.9Sep 10, 2026CVE-2026-86074
n8n: Instance AI Credential Setup Accepts Unvalidated Probe URL from Fetched Content
medium5.9Sep 10, 2026CVE-2026-86075
n8n: Unauthenticated Persistent Storage Exhaustion via OAuth Dynamic Client Registration Endpoint
high8.7Sep 10, 2026CVE-2026-86076
n8n: Expression Sandbox Escape via Class-Field Sanitizer Rebinding Can Lead to Code Execution
high8.7Sep 10, 2026CVE-2026-86077
n8n: Anonymous Approval-Gate Bypass via Reused resumeToken over the Chat WebSocket
medium6.3Sep 10, 2026CVE-2026-86078
n8n: Prototype Pollution via Workflow Structure Summary Can Lead to Denial of Service
medium6.0Sep 10, 2026
