GHSA-fqrj-m88p-qf3v: OpenClaw: Zalo replay dedupe cache could suppress events across authenticated webhook targets
Summary Before OpenClaw 2026.3.31, the Zalo webhook replay-dedupe cache was shared across authenticated webhook targets and keyed too broadly. In multi-account deployments, a replay seen on one account could suppress a legitimate event on another account if eventname and messageid matched.
Published Apr 7, 2026 · Updated Apr 22, 2026
Affected packages
openclaw
- Ecosystem
- npm
- Affected
- >= 2026.2.19, < 2026.3.31
- Fixed in
- 2026.3.31
- Check
npm ls openclaw
Advisory details
From the GitHub Advisory Database (CC BY 4.0).
Summary
Before OpenClaw 2026.3.31, the Zalo webhook replay-dedupe cache was shared across authenticated webhook targets and keyed too broadly. In multi-account deployments, a replay seen on one account could suppress a legitimate event on another account if event_name and message_id matched.
Impact
An attacker who controlled one authenticated Zalo webhook path in a multi-account gateway deployment could cause silent message suppression on a different Zalo account sharing that gateway. This was an availability issue; it did not provide cross-account authentication or data access.
Affected Packages / Versions
- Package:
openclaw(npm) - Affected versions:
>= 2026.2.19, < 2026.3.31 - Patched versions:
>= 2026.3.31 - Latest published npm version:
2026.4.1
Fix Commit(s)
4d038bb242c11f39e45f6a4bde400e5fd42e4ebf— scope webhook replay dedupe per target7cea7c29705b188b464cc9cdc107c275b94b2a72— follow-up hardening to scope replay dedupe by path and account
Release Process Note
The initial fix shipped in OpenClaw 2026.3.31 on March 31, 2026. The current published npm release 2026.4.1 from April 1, 2026 also contains follow-up hardening for the same surface.
Thanks @nexrin for reporting.
Credited to nexrin, KeenSecurityLab, qclawer.
References
How this page is made: the data panel comes from the GitHub Advisory Database, CISA’s KEV catalog, the NVD and FIRST EPSS, and updates twice a day. No analysis has been written for this entry yet. Methodology
More OpenClaw vulnerabilities
All OpenClaw entriesCVE-2026-35630
OpenClaw: QQBot native approval buttons did not enforce configured approver identity
high8.0Jul 2, 2026CVE-2026-53806
OpenClaw: Combined POSIX shell options could confuse exec revalidation
high8.8Jul 2, 2026CVE-2026-53809
OpenClaw: Embedded runner policy could be confused by provider aliases
medium3.8Jul 2, 2026CVE-2026-53810
OpenClaw's marketplace runtime extension metadata could point at unscanned payloads
high8.8Jul 2, 2026CVE-2026-53811
OpenClaw: Matrix allowFrom could bind to mutable display names
high8.8Jul 2, 2026CVE-2026-53812
OpenClaw's browser act interactions could bypass private-network navigation checks
medium7.7Jul 2, 2026
