GHSA-hfpr-jhpq-x4rm: OpenClaw: `operator.write` chat.send could reach admin-only config writes
Summary A gateway client authenticated with operator.write could route /config set or /config unset through chat.send and reach persistent config mutation even though direct config RPC methods are admin-scoped. Affected Packages / Versions - Package: openclaw (npm) - Latest published vulnerable version: 2026.3.2 - Affected range: .configWrites gates.
Published Mar 9, 2026
Affected packages
openclaw
- Ecosystem
- npm
- Affected
- <= 2026.3.2
- Fixed in
- 2026.3.7
- Check
npm ls openclaw
Advisory details
From the GitHub Advisory Database (CC BY 4.0).
Summary
A gateway client authenticated with operator.write could route /config set or /config unset through chat.send and reach persistent config mutation even though direct config RPC methods are admin-scoped.
Affected Packages / Versions
- Package:
openclaw(npm) - Latest published vulnerable version:
2026.3.2 - Affected range:
<= 2026.3.2 - Patched in:
2026.3.7
Details
Before the fix, chat.send ran slash commands in an internal gateway-chat context with CommandAuthorized: true, and /config write paths only checked command authorization plus commands.config / channels.<provider>.configWrites gates. That allowed an authenticated operator.write gateway client to bridge into persistent config writes even though direct config.* RPC methods remain operator.admin scoped.
The fix keeps command functionality intact while restoring the intended scope boundary:
- persistent
/config set|unsetwrites routed through gatewaychat.sendnow requireoperator.admin - read-only
/config showremains available to normal write-scoped gateway clients - normal messaging-channel
/configbehavior remains unchanged
Impact
This is a real authorization mismatch, but exploitability requires an already authenticated gateway client with operator.write, chat.send access, and /config command support enabled. Maintainer severity is set to medium because the bug is a scoped control-plane privilege mismatch rather than a broad unauthenticated or generic remote compromise. The main consequence is unintended persistent config mutation.
Fix Commit(s)
5f8f58ae25e2a78f31b06edcf26532d634ca554e
Release Process Note
npm 2026.3.7 was published on March 8, 2026. This advisory is fixed in the released package.
Thanks @tdjackey for reporting.
Credited to tdjackey.
References
How this page is made: the data panel comes from the GitHub Advisory Database, CISA’s KEV catalog, the NVD and FIRST EPSS, and updates twice a day. No analysis has been written for this entry yet. Methodology
More OpenClaw vulnerabilities
All OpenClaw entriesCVE-2026-35630
OpenClaw: QQBot native approval buttons did not enforce configured approver identity
high8.0Jul 2, 2026CVE-2026-53806
OpenClaw: Combined POSIX shell options could confuse exec revalidation
high8.8Jul 2, 2026CVE-2026-53809
OpenClaw: Embedded runner policy could be confused by provider aliases
medium3.8Jul 2, 2026CVE-2026-53810
OpenClaw's marketplace runtime extension metadata could point at unscanned payloads
high8.8Jul 2, 2026CVE-2026-53811
OpenClaw: Matrix allowFrom could bind to mutable display names
high8.8Jul 2, 2026CVE-2026-53812
OpenClaw's browser act interactions could bypass private-network navigation checks
medium7.7Jul 2, 2026
