CVE-2026-70486: Open WebUI: Same-origin XSS to account takeover via terminal file-preview iframe hardcoding allow-same-origin
Summary Any authenticated user with access to a terminal server could get script of their choosing to run in the Open WebUI origin itself. The HTML file preview rendered terminal-served files in an iframe whose sandbox always granted allow-same-origin alongside allow-scripts, and the file is served from a path on the application's own origin, so the sandbox provided no isolation at all.
Published Aug 4, 2026
Affected packages
open-webui
- Ecosystem
- PyPI
- Affected
- >= 0.9.0, <= 0.10.2
- Fixed in
- 0.11.0
- Check
pip show open-webui
Advisory details
From the GitHub Advisory Database (CC BY 4.0).
Summary
Any authenticated user with access to a terminal server could get script of their choosing to run in the Open WebUI origin itself. The HTML file preview rendered terminal-served files in an iframe whose sandbox always granted allow-same-origin alongside allow-scripts, and the file is served from a path on the application's own origin, so the sandbox provided no isolation at all. Script in a previewed file could read the victim's session token and take over the account.
Preconditions
- At least one terminal server configured by an admin (
TERMINAL_SERVER_CONNECTIONS, empty by default) and reachable by the victim. Deployments with no terminal server configured are not affected. - The attacker needs a normal authenticated account with access to that terminal server, no admin rights.
- No victim interaction beyond having the chat open: a
display_filetool call opens the preview automatically. TERMINAL_PROXY_HEADERSunset, which is the default. An operator who had already set a restrictive Content-Security-Policy through it was not exposed, since those headers are merged into every proxied response including the served file.- The
iframeSandboxAllowSameOriginuser setting is off by default, but the affected branch ignored it entirely.
Impact
The previewed document runs in the application origin, so it can reach the parent window, read the session token out of localStorage and exfiltrate it, which is full account takeover of the victim. If the victim is an admin, or any user holding workspace.functions, that takeover extends to server-side code execution through Functions. Getting the malicious file written and displayed still requires a prompt-injection or a social step, which is what keeps the complexity high rather than trivial. Instances with no terminal server configured were never affected, and neither was the srcdoc preview path.
Fix
Fixed in 0.11.0 by 65a5fad7b (#26907). The serveUrl preview branch now gates allow-same-origin behind the same iframeSandboxAllowSameOrigin setting the srcdoc branch already used, so by default the preview loads at an opaque origin and cannot reach the parent context. Upgrading is sufficient, no configuration change is required, and HTML previews continue to render normally.
Root cause
src/lib/components/chat/FileNav/FilePreview.svelte, theserveUrliframe branch, reached for HTML files served through/api/v1/terminals/{id}/files/serve/....- Present from 0.9.0, where that branch was introduced, through 0.10.2.
The component grew two preview paths. The srcdoc path was hardened: same-origin became opt-in and a CSP was injected into the document. The serveUrl path, added later for files streamed from a terminal server, kept a static sandbox string with allow-same-origin baked into it. Because the terminal proxy is mounted under the application's own origin and forwards the upstream response without adding a Content-Security-Policy of its own unless the operator configured one, and no global CSP is set, the sandbox was the only isolation boundary left, and it was granting precisely the permission that dissolved it.
Proof of concept
Write an HTML file containing a script that reads window.parent.localStorage.token to a terminal server the victim can reach, then trigger display_file for that file. The chat handler opens the preview on the resulting terminal:display_file event with no click, the script executes at the application origin, and the token is exfiltrated.
Credits
Reported by @manus-use (researcher zx / Jace).
Credited to manus-use, Classic298.
References
- https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/security/advisories/GHSA-3xpf-xq7r-v8c5
- https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/pull/26907
- https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/commit/65a5fad7b97db99d490d81f4e0860282c3a4543c
- https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/releases/tag/v0.11.0
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-3xpf-xq7r-v8c5
How this page is made: the data panel comes from the GitHub Advisory Database, CISA’s KEV catalog, the NVD and FIRST EPSS, and updates twice a day. No analysis has been written for this entry yet. Methodology
More Open WebUI vulnerabilities
All Open WebUI entriesCVE-2026-87011
Open WebUI: Unauthenticated requests can stall the server via uncached OIDC fetches in back-channel logout
high7.5Sep 10, 2026CVE-2026-87012
Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can suppress calendar alerts instance-wide via a non-numeric alert value
medium4.3Sep 10, 2026CVE-2026-87013
Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can start a non-terminating request via a folder parent cycle
medium4.3Sep 10, 2026CVE-2026-87014
Open WebUI: Admin demoted through SSO role sync keeps read and write access to all users' notes
medium6.5Sep 10, 2026CVE-2026-87015
Open WebUI: A user's session cookies are sent to tool servers configured for bearer authentication
medium6.8Sep 10, 2026CVE-2026-87016
Open WebUI: Sign-in as another user via wildcard characters in the OAuth subject claim on SQLite
high8.1Sep 10, 2026
